Legal Certainty for Creditors Due to Legal Efforts to Postpone Debtors' Debt Payment Obligations
Main Article Content
Sodikin Sodikin
Roosdiana Harahap
The Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is a legal procedure that allows debtors who are unable, or expect to be unable, to continue paying their due and collectible debts to seek legal recourse. Debtors in such situations can initiate legal action during the PKPU process. However, the question arises: what is the legal certainty for creditors following the Constitutional Court's decision that encourages debtors to pursue legal action? This study uses a descriptive normative research method to analyze the legal issues related to such actions. The findings indicate that the legal recourse available to debtors in specific circumstances significantly impacts creditors. This leads to uncertainties regarding payment, especially if the debtor decides to file for legal action. Additionally, these uncertainties can affect the creditor's business operations. The Constitutional Court's decision, subsequently reinforced by a Circular Letter from the Supreme Court, does not adequately address the gaps in legal certainty faced by creditors. This situation complicates creditors' efforts to secure their rights, which are the obligations of the debtor.
Aji, A. H. M. & A. P. (2023). Relevance of The Implementation of Law No. 37 of 2004: Concerning Bankruptcy And Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations in Accounting Perspective. Journal Of Legal Studies And Research, 9(1), 198–209. %0Awww.thelawbrigade.com
Budiyono, T. (2021). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Antara Solusi dan Jebakan. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(3).
Darminto Hartono. (2009). Economic Analysis of Law Atas Putusan PKPU Tetap. Lembaga Studi Hukum dan Ekonnomi FH UI.
Dewi, P. E. T. (2019). Implementasi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Dalam Kepailitan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, 1(2), 280–291. https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/JHS/article/view/662
Elsa Mellinda Saputri, Waspiah, R. A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Hal Pengembang (Developer) Apartemen Dinyatakan Pailit. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2(2), 151–161.
Eva Puspita Sari, E. K. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Proses PKPU Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 23/PUU-XIX/2021. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 6(1), 1–13.
Fitria, A. (2018). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Debitor Mencegah Kepailitan. Lex Jurnalica, 15(1), 18–28.
Fuady, M. (2017). Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Gunawan, D., Eddy, T., & Mansar, A. (2024). Implementation Of General Bankruptcy Confiscation And Postponement Of Debt Payment Obligations ( PKPU ) Proceeding 2 nd Medan International Economics and Business. Proceeding 2nd Medan International Economics and Business, 2(1), 1625–1632.
Haichal, F. (2022). Restrukturisasi Utang Melalui Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Upaya Menghindari Kepailitan Bagi Debitor yang Gagal Bayar Karena Terdampak Covid-19. Jurist-Diction, 5(6), 2205–2226. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i6.40125
Maryono, A. S., Afwa, U., & Putri, R. (2022). Quo Vadis Esensi Lembaga PKPU Pasca-Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 23/PUU-XIX/2021. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis., 3(4), 247–268.
Mawwaddah, L. (2020). Ketidakmampuan Membayar Utang dalam Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang oleh Mantan Pilot Lion Air. El-Iqtishady, 2(2), 1–14.
Miranda Lufti Nasution, Sunarmi, R. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Hukum Kasasi Terhadap Putusan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Studi Putusan No. 23/PUU-XIX/2021. Recht Studiosum Law Review, 02(02), 20–37.
Nainggolan, B. (2022). Postponement Of Debt Payment Obligations ( Pkpu ) In Indonesian Bankruptcy Law : Strategic Approach To Addressing Business Challenges. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 9(3), 527–540.
Nugroho, S. A. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia: Dalam Teori dan Praktik serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Prenada Media Group.
Putra, Reval Pradana, & Hariyana, T. D. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Debitur Yang Tidak Melaksanakan Kewajibannya Terhadap Kreditur Berdasarkan Perjanjian PKPU ( Studi Kasus PT . ST ). Welfare State, 1(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56013/welfarestate.v1i2.1596
Putri, A., Hidayat, A., & Afriana, A. (2021). The Postponement of Settlement Ratification in Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations by Judge Associated With the Principle of Legal Certainty. Poros Hukum, 3(1), 19–36.
Rado Fridsel Leonardus, Alexander Yovie Pratama Yudha, T. W. (2023). Practice of Applying Affidavits in Bankruptcy Law and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. UNES Law Review, 9(2), 467–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v9i2.37204
Sagala, E. (2015). Efektifitas Lembaga Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Pkpu) Untuk Menghindarkan Debitur Dari Pailit. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 03(01), 38–56.
Sihotang, D. P. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Debitor Terhadap Kreditor Konkuren Setelah Homologasi Perjanjian Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang ( PKPU ). Aliansi : Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.47
Sjahdaeni, S. R. (2009). Hukum Kepailitan; Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Soelistyo, L. T. D. (2022). Problematika Hukum Proses Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Tetap Oleh Kreditor. Maleo Law Journal, 6(1), 95–104.
Sundah, B. (2022). Pembatalan Putusan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Oleh Mahkamah Agung (Putusan Nomor 555k/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021). Jurnal Education and Development, 10(3), 351–356. https://doi.org/http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/vie
Yudha, G. N. W. (2022). AKIBAT Hukum Penolakan Rencana Perdamaian Debitur Oleh Kreditur Dalam Proses Penundaan Kewajiban. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 3(1), 196–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.3.1.4447.196-200
Roosdiana Harahap, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Fakultas Hukum
